Re: back to basics: what's wrong with this exim condition statement?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: back to basics: what's wrong with this exim condition statement?
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:26:42 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071213012642.GH3266@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4e312cc10712121703g6c710487q9ab017a463fed6e8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4e312cc10712121703g6c710487q9ab017a463fed6e8@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:03:29PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
> nevermind - I finally figured it out...

do tell Bob!

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- back to basics: what's wrong with this exim condition statement?
  - From: "Bob Goldberg" <bobg.hahc@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: back to basics: what's wrong with this exim condition statement?
Next by Date: Re: Files/directories dated 2012?
Previous by thread: back to basics: what's wrong with this exim condition statement?
Next by thread: How to start KDE from a console prompt?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread