Re: Network is unreachable email error
hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
> emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, does
> not work to send email since last week, please see following error
> message. Any suggestion what I could do wrong?
>
> Dec 9 14:13:48 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: connect to
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[209.85.147.27]: Network is unreachable
> (port 25)
> Dec 9 14:13:48 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: connect to
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[209.85.147.114]: Network is unreachable
> (port 25)
> Dec 9 14:13:49 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: connect to
> alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[66.249.91.27]: Network is unreachable
> (port 25)
> Dec 9 14:13:49 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: connect to
> alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[64.233.179.27]: Network is unreachable
> (port 25)
> Dec 9 14:13:49 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: connect to
> gsmtp183.google.com[64.233.183.27]: Network is unreachable (port 25)
> Dec 9 14:13:49 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: 5523B42A9C:
> to=<jupiter.hce@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=2, delays=0.03/0/2/0,
> dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
> gsmtp183.google.com[64.233.183.27]: Network is unreachable)
> Dec 9 14:13:49 debian postfix/smtp[13065]: 5523B42A9C:
> to=<webmail.hce@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=2, delays=0.03/0/2/0,
> dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
> gsmtp183.google.com[64.233.183.27]: Network is unreachable)
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Jim
>
>
Jim, from the looks of your logs (I'm assuming /var/log/mail.log--you
didn't say in your message), you're not actually sending mail through
gmail's server. Can you explain a bit more about your mail setup
(Debian version, Postfix settings, etc.)?
Something easy to try in the meantime: can you establish an SMTP
connection via telnet/netcat to 64.233.183.27 and 209.85.147.27?
username@debian:~$ telnet 64.233.183.27 25
FYI, I can establish SMTP connections on both of the IP addresses listed
in your log messages, so the servers are listening for connections.
--John
Reply to: