How to resolv samba server names when using Ad-Hoc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,..
maybe this is the wrong place i will be glad if it will be forwarded
to the correct place.
On my lpatop i have samba shares (Debian Testing) and the
configuration is here :
[CODE][global]
workgroup = MSHOME
netbios name = acerium
security = share
server string = %h server
[iso]
path = /mnt/hda2/iso
browsable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok =yes
comment = ISO files (mostly debian related)
[movies]
forceuser = Temp
path = /mnt/hda2/movie
comment = Guess what ?
browsable = yes
guest ok=yes
writeable = no
[download]
forceuser = Temp
path = /mnt/hda3/download
comment = Guess what ?
browsable = yes
guest ok=yes
writeable = no
[games]
forceuser = Temp
path = /mnt/hda2/games
comment = Guess what
browsable = yes
guest ok=yes
writeable = no
[/CODE]
When i work with routers (i get an ip and get all the names from
nameservers)
i can easily accsed by smb://acerium (servername) or can be checked
by smbclient -L //acerium
but when i work with Ad-Hoc i can't resolve.
when i try to check smb://work_group i get no computers in your
workgroup. (from memory maybe it said in diffrent words)
maybe it is related to the thing that the samba server isn't the main
one . or some thing related to domain master = yes
but the problem with that is : (it will interfeare with other NT
domain masters.)
Thank you in advance..
- --
- --
Could you at least use man ?
Jabka Atu (aka mha13/Mashrom Head) || bsh83.blogspot.com
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=U2Oc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: