On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:24:16AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I also dubt that udev will ever be able to do anything useful, but I
> > cannot be sure since for my good luck I do not use it.
> udev is very important to modern SCSI-heavy kernels, since the SCSI
> subsystem has always had the irksome habit of renaming existing
> devices if a new devices is added.
yes, this is useful. But for mounting drives this is also solved without
udev by mounting filesystems by labels, uuids [or by lvm devices since
it is very likely that one uses LVM evms or similar on scsi drives,
since (apart other advantages of LVM/evms) the limit sda1 to sda15 for
Once I hoped that udev would be able to circunvent that limitation (and
so monut partitions >15 in large ide discs attached to an external USB
enclosure without using the tricky "offset" parameter of mount). By it
seems that such hope was wrong.
Chi usa software non libero avvelena anche te. Digli di smettere.
Informatica=arsenico: minime dosi in rari casi patologici, altrimenti letale.
Informatica=bomba: intelligente solo per gli stupidi che ci credono.
- Re: SUDO
- From: Michelle Konzack <email@example.com>
- Re: SUDO
- From: Ron Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>