Re: chmod 670
Raj Kiran Grandhi <grajkiran@gmail.com>:
>
> Is there some reason why you would "chmod 670" and not "chmod 770"?
To cause filesystem breakage? :-) It's not a bright thing to do.
Users do a lot of not bright things. We should know what's going to
happen when they do this.
It's interesting phenomena, so far, apparently repeatable by others.
I await further reports.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Reply to:
- References:
- chmod 670
- From: Patricio Rojo <ss2@wasabi.das.uchile.cl>
- Re: chmod 670
- From: Raj Kiran Grandhi <grajkiran@gmail.com>