Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:02:47 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071101230247.GD7991@titan.hooton>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1193949180.763566.60160@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <47236ECE.8040806@stikman.com> <C42CD393-E7AC-4860-AD3E-25A00DEF6D00@natetech.com> <47239606.8090507@untrammelled.co.uk> <[🔎] 1193949180.763566.60160@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:33:00PM -0000, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
 
> So exercising an abundance of caution I usually stick with synaptic.
> Maybe on my next install I'll look into Aptitude.

What do you do when X dies or needs changing?

Doug.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
  - From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
  - From: "Michael M. Moore" <michael@writemoore.net>

References:
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
  - From: BartlebyScrivener <bscrivener42@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: how do i go back to stable? [was: reverting to 'standard' etch installation]
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: Installing Packages From Source]
Previous by thread: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
Next by thread: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread