[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question

On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:17:21PM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
> > is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 	   No!, it is yet another Americanism. :-) 

but it works so well! besides, I grew up saying a-whole-nother, so
there's no hope for me...


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: