On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:17:21PM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload > > is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > No!, it is yet another Americanism. :-) but it works so well! besides, I grew up saying a-whole-nother, so there's no hope for me... A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature