Mike McCarty wrote: > May I suggest to the Debian developers that, should they > contemplate including SELinux into Debian, they not follow > Red Hat's decision to make it a fixed part of the distro, > which can be disabled, but rather continue to provide a > version of the distro which just does not have SELinux > in it at all? If the Debian Devel Team decides to incorporate > SELinux, then I recommend that the distro be split into > a SELinux and a non-SELinux version. Merely turning SELinux > off is (IMO, after seeing the mess over at Fedora the last > few years) not enough. SE Linux is already included in Debian, and is even installed, though not enabled, by default. You can remove the selinux-policy-* packages to remove it. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature