Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.

To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
From: "Mumia W.." <paduille.4061.mumia.w+nospam@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:46:09 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 46E5E551.90104@earthlink.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070910194646.GD10992@ftbfs.de>
References: <[🔎] 1189449675.711432.183710@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <[🔎] 20070910194646.GD10992@ftbfs.de>

On 09/10/2007 02:46 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:

Hi,
On Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 18:41:15 -0000, J wrote:
Real problem with debian user is not spam, but that posts don' t getposted.
Can you please check if you are subscribed towhitelist@lists.debian.org?
[...]


Huh? This is the first I've heard of that address? Where is it documented?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
  - From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <kamaraju@bluebottle.com>

References:
- Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
  - From: J <j1234f@excite.com>
- Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
  - From: Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@ftbfs.de>

Prev by Date: postgresql help
Next by Date: Re: Iptables & Default policy of Reject
Previous by thread: Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
Next by thread: Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread