[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Installing a JRE plug-in



On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, andy wrote:

Jeff D wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, andy wrote:

Jeff D wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, andy wrote:

Jeff D wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, andy wrote:

Jeff D wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, andy wrote:

Dear each

Iceweasel is telling me that I have a missing plugin, the JRE, which I need for a course. I have downloaded jre-6u1-linux-i586.bin (which is the appropriate plug-in), but:
(i) is this the best thing to be using on a Lenny/Sid system and
(ii) if so, how do I go about installing a *.bin file on my system?

Many thanks

A



The easiest way would be to make sure you have non-free in your /etc/apt/sources.list , run aptitude update and then aptitude install sun-java6-bin


Thanks

I've already done that - it still doesn't show up as working in any of the three browsers I use and when testing at the sun site, it reports that java6 is not installed. Hence, I want to pursue Martin's earlier suggestion re: symlinks, but cannot track down where sun-java6-jre was installed.

A



Thats odd, it should create a symlink to /etc/alternatives/mozilla-javaplugin.so

what does update-alternatives --list mozilla-javaplugin.so give you?
it should give you something like this:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so

Jeff

It gives me something very similar:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so

I wasn't aware of that command to be honest, so hence was using find and whereis.

Thanks - now onto symlinking. Do I have to do this with Konqueror, Galeon, and Opera as well as Iceweasel?

A


I can only speak for iceweasel, but there should be a link in /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins to /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so

If everything has been installed from apt you really shouldn't need to symlink anything.

in iceweasel, if you put about:plugins in the address bar, does it show that the java plugin is loaded?


Jeff

Yes, about:plugins shows 3 main groups of application/x-java-bean, x-java-vm, and x-java-applet

Am I supposed to be seeing something in addition to these?

A


No, that sounds normal, at least we know that the java plugin is loading. But the site shouldn't be telling you that you are missing the java plunin though .

Jeff

When I go to http://www.java.com/en/ and click the link that asks "Do I have java?", which opens http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?detect=jre&try=1 then the result is that I don't have the recommended version for my browser (iceweasel). I have removed sun-java6 and installed sun-java5, run the update-java-alternatives command and still get the same result. The recommended version of java the sun/java site is 6.1

Now it is quite possible that the site may default to that in order to promote its latest release, so I am quite willing to consider that another java-rich site may provide a better/more accurate test. Do you know of any site that may prove a worthwhile place to test the java installation?

Cheers

A



I get the same thing. It looks like the java site is complaining because the version in the repositories its 6.0 and not the newest 6.1. I personally haven't had any problems with the version of java provided from the debian repositories. All the sites I have visited have been just fine.


 -+-
8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said Their Cats Preferred Techno.



Reply to: