[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Icedove



On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:00:16PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hi Andrew.
> 
> Andrew Sackville-West, 22.05.2007 19:53:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:42:07PM +0100, andy wrote:
> >> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:17:36AM -0600, Art Edwards wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>> Icedove/testing appears to be seriously broken. […]
> >>> A
> >>>  
> >> What version Icedove? I'm running version 1.5.0.10 (20070329) and so 
> >> far, so good. I am also updating from testing/Lenny.
> > 
> > the other mail mentioned 2.0.0.3 which is in sid and apparently is now
> > propogating into lenny.
> 
> This cannot be since this version has not passed the 10 days yet; currently in
> Testing is still version 1.5.0.10.

you are, of course, correct. There was some confusion (in my brain)
thinking the other poster was running lenny, but he's not. 

To the OP, what version are you running? I think you may have
inadvertently moved up to sid instead of staying in lenny.

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: