Re: [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
nicholas wrote:
> Ron Johnson said:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/26/07 11:55, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:10:53AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>> On 04/26/07 08:35, Masatran, R. Deepak wrote:
>>>>> To work with a remote computer over a slow internet connection,
>>>>> which is
>>>>> better: SSH or SSHFS? Of course it depends on the situation, but in
>>>>> what
>>>>> situation is each better?
>>>> You are asking "Which is better: apples or rocks?". Neither are
>>>> "better", since each has a different *purpose*.
>>>
>>> clearly rocks are better as they can be used to get apples. ;-P
>>
>> To knock a fruit from a high branch?
>
> No, to knock out the fruit vendor while you snag the apples.
>
>
City boy! ;) Clearly apples are better because they can be eaten, rocks
are handy throwing objects, but apples can also be used in the same manor.
Of course this is all irrelevant to SSH, but this thread is so fun I
couldn't help but take the other side.
Now, if we were to throw oranges into the equation, then that would
cause a whole new round of "which is better".
Needless to say, both rocks and apples have their purposes. But you
can't eat rocks. Well, yes you can but you can't digest them.
Joe
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGMOSyiXBCVWpc5J4RAqtrAJ9yfi2TvwKEUXOxi5sfI/SuQHtPWgCdHmfX
gdHbKoqVv0VNTN6Maa7T2Kg=
=8rjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: