Re: Daily Updates
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:37:40 GMT
"s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca> wrote:
> Michael Pobega <pobega@gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:56:14PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:51:23PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:32:33AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > > > > Joe Hart writes:
> > > > > > if you're running Etch you won't be getting many, if you're running Lenny
> > > > > > (which is kind of hard because AFAIK it isn't all complete yet)
> > > > >
> > > > > Lenny (Testing) is complete. It just happens to be nearly identical to
> > > > > Etch at the moment.
> > > >
> > > > I've got a quick question, I'm wondering if I'm the only one: For some
> > > > reason my /etc/debian_version says I'm running "lenny/sid", I'm hoping
> > > > this is only temporary though?
> > > >
> > > > Not that I care what my version is called, but I'm just wondering. I
> > > > haven't been around long enough for a version upgrade yet.
> > >
> > > My Etch box (installed when etch was still testing) says 4.0.
> > >
> > > How did you end up with lenny/sid?
>
> Lenny is not Sid now. Sheesh. Don't further confuse the guy.
>
> > No idea, all I have is testing in my sources.list
> >
> > [pobega]$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot i386
> > # NETINST Binary-1 20070107-08:41]/ etch contrib main
> >
> > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
> ......................................^^^^^^^
>
> Etch has gone stable. Lenny is the new testing. You're running
> testing (now Lenny).
>
> To avoid such surprises in the future, change any "testing" in
> /etc/apt/sources.list to "lenny". When Lenny goes stable (2012? :-),
> you'll continue to track Lenny, not "testing."
>
> Somebody in here's been posting with essentially that in his .sig for
> at least two months now. This is way old knowledge now.
My /etc/debian_version is 'lenny/sid'. My /etc/apt/sources.list
contains only references to Sid, and always did.
Celejar
Reply to: