Re: GPL v3?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 02:27, John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org> was
heard to say:
> As to why I say nothing can be done, what I see as
> major defects are inevitable consequences of what Richard clearly
> views as essential features.
Beautifully said, in clear, concise language.
Which _demonstrates_ my objection to the GPL.3
(For the syntactically challenged, what means I don't have to agree
with what Mr. Hasler said, what I like is how he said it.)
What I believe the GPL.3 does right is to simplify and clarify. A
great deal of what is different between the GPL.3 and the GPL.2 is
linguistic optimization.
Would that it had been left at that.
Curt-
- --
September 11th, 2001
The proudest day for gun control and central
planning advocates in American history
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRhJUdy9Y35yItIgBAQIOXgf/W8SACjSnRR6srijM/9VPOhxdeTlwl8/0
oomEJnTaABRMwlscmkJ44k29/fLyJuU2Nw3HnxVrceI7b3jwN510y+rk4WIuu9Ie
z6fyYKIpC1KO4WPTPlI+tWx3cd5uemaiNF6PgCdVHSSHffUAqtBOpXsSe6vneLjI
23MSiP4+hxtYvIKjVFr33OLoKXG+2uza79Gh/eSsavS+ZbN27WTASnZytjhsT2N6
xwYoV5Pm/INv8ZI0lRBGD91csA6s8M1hGMsxud6g/C0u2RHIGE7Hi4B0eAhcgz6m
igQn/5xsl/mlK7YdQPr72Xk9W49R7EIBlfRyOpZERAVo6ZYI6v+s1Q==
=ndzc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: