Re: GPL v3?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GPL v3?
From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:19:46 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070403031946.GA11447@titan>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 878xda9n90.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070403022601.GA10308@titan> <[🔎] 20070403024020.GA10316@localhost> <[🔎] 878xda9n90.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:59:23PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:

> > I'd like to know what the more knowledgeable people here would have to
> > say about the GPLv3...
> 
> It's appalling, but there is nothing to be done.

Would you elaborate?  It left me concerned but I'm not a language lawyer
so I don't really understand.  If you're appauled, presumably you 'get
it'.

Doug.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL v3?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>

References:
- GPL v3?
  - From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
- Re: GPL v3?
  - From: Michael Pobega <pobega@gmail.com>
- Re: GPL v3?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: GPL v3?
Next by Date: Re: GPL v3?
Previous by thread: Re: GPL v3?
Next by thread: Re: GPL v3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread