Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 18:11, Seth Goodman wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote on Friday, March 30, 2007 5:50 PM -0500:
>
>> And the counter argument would be that not-munging-Reply-To has
>> always been popular amongst people who know what they are doing.
>
> Most people who know what they're doing don't insist that the rest
> of the world changes its behavior on something that is not
> important.
We're not insisting that other MLs do it properly. (Of course, it
would be a good thing.)
> Besides, you rejected popularity as an argument.
I'm not actually using it, but just saying what the counter-argument
*would* be if we accepted popularity as a valid point of argument.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDdBFS9HxQb37XmcRAmqdAJ4spwwGb9JQd6t7OS3d6glLjL9mbQCfQl7/
2Vil+K1F9bgFRk7xB6lTT6M=
=N4Y7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: