Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/30/07 14:09, Seth Goodman wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote on Friday, March 30, 2007 9:06 AM -0500:
> >> On 03/30/07 08:32, galevsky@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> I am forwarding previous answers.... and adding that I do not want
> >>> to pop these mails since I suscribed lots of ML, not only debian
> >>> ones, and it is more convenient for me to read&write from gmail
> >>> than poping 3 times (work - home - laptop) thousands of mails.....
> >> Complain to Google that their MUA is lacking an important feature.
> >
> > It's only important to the Debian mailing lists and a small number of
> > others. It's not important to the majority of other mailing lists, and
> > that's probably why Google and many others don't bother supporting that
> > function.
>
> It's like using MSFT. If all you've ever known is a buggy malware-
> filled OS, and you've been conditioned to grab your ankles, crying
> "Thank you Mr Gates, may I have another!" then you don't know any
> better.
>
> We, however, know that just because Joe User doesn't know any
> better, it doesn't mean that there is nothing better.
Aaaaayyaha, men, brother! \o/ \o/ \o/
I always akin it to:
If all you ever have eaten all your life is dog-poo, how do you
know any better?
You get the drift?
--
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's
Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive
product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at
the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
Reply to: