Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/07 23:33, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:52 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> Why not just go bioethanol in a larger percentage year round? Portland is,
>>> and it might go statewide by the end of the session. Gasoline sales are
>>> banned here for the better.
>> Probably because to produce 1 gallon of bio you need to use 1 gallon of
>> gasoline. It's completely 0-sum right now.
>
> Actually there is about a 7% loss right now. So 1 gallon of Ethanol
> equates to a loss of energy rather than a gain.
But that doesn't matter. What matters is that socialist control
freaks get to tell you what to do.
But you knew that... ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF931cS9HxQb37XmcRAn4jAKCTiG+nVfoCrhP0G6M4L69GLWA7iwCgihJn
jAFo1cry5CwDnlr1l3GU0qI=
=HVHl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: