[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Procmail recipe problems



On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:37:50AM -0800, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> On Mar 08 2007, S Scharf wrote:
> > 
> > On 3/8/07, Arlie Stephens <arlie@worldash.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >The recipe that *usually* works, indented here for convenient reading.
> > >
> > >    # Debian User List
> > >    :0H:
> > >    * ^(To|Cc):.*debian-user
> > >    -debian-user
> > >
> > >
> > Does running procmail with the VERBOSE flag reveal anything?
> 
> Good question. I'd forgotten that was possible, if I ever knew. Let's
> see if I can figure out how to do it ;-) (Procmail is presently
> running automatically, with whatever arguments postfix decides to pass
> it ;-) However, I distinctly remember running it from the command
> line, some years ago, when first figuring out how to use it ;-)) 
> 
> More info when I've figured that out. A quick scan of the procmail man
> page isn't sufficient - neither for making it verbose nor for figuring
> out how to get it to process mail from an existing file - so I may not
> get farther data until after work today. (It's my home system that's
> misbehaving, and I really ought to have left for work already.) 
> 

you can set a logfile and verbosity

VERBOSE=on
LOGILE=...

in .procmailrc.

A



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: