On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:32:34PM +0000, John K Masters wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:01:06 -0500 > Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote: > > > According to 'apt-cache show squirrelmail' (for sid), the current 2 > > packages (1.4.9a-1 and 1.5.1-4) support php4 or php5. Check the result > > for 'etch' (which is still 'testing'). Here is the related info: > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Version: 2:1.4.9a-1 > > Depends: apache2 | httpd, libapache2-mod-php4 | libapache-mod-php4 | > > php4 | php4-cgi | libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache-mod-php5 | php5-cgi | > > php5, perl > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Version: 2:1.5.1-4 > > Depends: apache2 | httpd, libapache2-mod-php4 | libapache-mod-php4 | > > php4 | php4-cgi | libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache-mod-php5 | php5-cgi | > > php5, perl > > ---------------------------------------------- > > cheers, > > Kev > > Yep! That's why I'm asking. When offered a choice I like to weigh up > other users experiences. Does latest = best or not so stable? ATEOTD > I'll probably go with PHP5 but I'd like to hear if others have some > horror stories first. > Are there any limiting factors? Do you use anything that must run one or the other? Since people are shifting to php5, it'd be where the development is going and any future apps will use it. But of course, php4 has more testing. But when etch goes stable, it will support php4 and php5. cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/| | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature