Re: APT::Default-Release accepts code-names? (long)
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:28:47 -0700
Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net> wrote:
> OTOH, people who are involved in maintaining user documentation should
> avoid statements that would lead a new user to believe that the two
> types of names (release and code) are absolutely equivalent. They are
> not equivalent if you attempt to use the priority pinning features,
> and maybe other features that I haven't look at. (But how many
> newbies do use priority pinning? Maybe this, also can be displaced by
> higher priority tasks.)
I wasn't talking about new users.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
Reply to: