Re: Email programs that work.
It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ...
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:29:51 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> On 26.08.06 03:55, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > s. keeling wrote:
> > > mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> > > an idiot. HTH. Twit.
> >
> > Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack.
> >
> > It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
> > restricted to the command line to get the job done.
>
> pardon? you can easily use ssmtp or msmtp for outgoing mail.
> (yes, direct smtp support in mutt would be nice, but with mtmsp it's not a
> big problem)
>
> > It lacks filtering.
>
> it supports 'l' for mail filtering. What else do you want?
>
> > It lacks a decent IMAP implementation. Hint, IMAP is not a glorified POP.
>
> I know, I use mutt with imap and I don't have problems wiht it. What IMAP
> features do you miss?
>
> > It lacks a decent multi-account implementation. Having to configure every
> > single item by hand without the concept of account inheritance is a
> > nightmare.
>
> tried 'muttprofile'?
>
Reply to: