On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:21:12PM -0400, Shawn Lamson wrote: > On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:00:22 -0700 > Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 08:15:03PM -0400, Shawn Lamson wrote: > > > > > > from http://www.debian.org/security/ > > > > > > You can use apt to easily get the latest security updates. This > > > requires a line such as > > > > > > deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free > > > > > <----- snip -----> > > > > > > > > > In other words, which is better for Etch (tetsing): > > > > > > > > deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib or > > > > > > > > ********* > > > > deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free > > ********* > > > > use this one for security updates for testing (which will track > > "testing" and leave etch behind when it moves to "stable"). To follow > > etch into stable, replace "testing" with "etch" above. > > i guess i was always under the impression that security updates were always for "stable" (sarge) ... sorry. > > I agree about using "testing" rather than "etch" ... i run "sid" but almost always use "stable" "testing" and "unstable" unless i want to impress/confuse someone :) I'm not "recommending" one or the other. In fact, if I were to do it, I'd probably choose etch and stick withit into stable. But thats not enough fun for me... sid baby all the way. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature