Re: Figuring out Why Standards are there.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (22/05/06 11:38), Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 03:32 -0700, formless void wrote:
>>> I finally found that W3C has got
>>>
>>> User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/
>>>
>>> Now my question is how authenticative W3C is?
>> What do you mean by "authenticative"? Do you mean au?thor?i?ta?tive?
>>
>> au?thor?i?ta?tive
>> adjective
[snip]
>> (WindowsXP ala Windows Vista) All without even addressing Standards
>> other than the proprietary ones they have created.
>> --
>> greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
>>
>> The technology that is
>> Stronger, Better, Faster: Linux
>>
>> Use Debian GNU/Linux, its a bazaar thing
>>
>> NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the
>> National Security Agency may have read this email
>> without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly
>> without probable cause. They may do this without
>> any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
>> recourse nor protection.
>
> Great answer!
When making such a short reply to such a long post, please snip out
the bulk of the original email.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEczlYS9HxQb37XmcRAu2YAJwPtWIqqlsGoslO7V1WwtCmpQs7LACg7yD9
nzD9lbv1dWlCygJgYcQObk4=
=kd1z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: