lee wrote: > Maybe the upgrade path from stable to testing has not been settled > yet. You may get better results with installing testing rather than > doing an upgrade. > > Actually, my point of view is that you can be better off with testing > when setting up a system that has to be kept up to date for years to > come, one reason for that being the hassle of eventually sticking with > older versions of software after an upgrade. For the last three > servers I set up at work, I decided to use testing, and they work > flawlessly. I'm also running it at home. > > > GH > The path have been settled well, I've done sarge > etch many times with no problem. This guy was asked to explain his upgrade procedure and show his apt configs as 2.4.18 really is the default 2.4 kernel with the old woody distrib. Yet he still just cries like baby. Well, cry off the list please! ;-) -- regards, Georgi Alexandrov key server - http://pgp.mit.edu/ :: key id - 0x37B4B3EE key fingerprint - E429 BF93 FA67 44E9 B7D4 F89E F990 01C1 37B4 B3EE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature