Re: linux arch with usb?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Joey Hess wrote:
> I'd use any. That's consistent with eg, usbutils.
That is because arch name does not tell you anything about hardware it
can include. For example old i386 machines without USB, new ones that
have USB support disabled in BIOS, etc. etc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----