>> Regulations prevent distribution = non-free > True, it's non-free by Debian standards. But I still would like to make > a distinction between blatantly non-free software, like the w32codecs, > and stuff licensed as free software, like libdvdcss. Agreed. It would be good to distinguish between those packages that are non-free because the author dosn't want to free it, from those packages that are non-free despite the best effort of the author. Stefan