Re: partitions
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:14 +0100, Jakub Narojczyk wrote:
> michael napisał(a):
>
> >I'm not sure if I'm messed up here but all advice welcome:
> >
> > I
> > used the WinXP setup CD to delete existing WinXP 32Gb partition,
> > created
> > 2 new 16Gb partitions, then made some spare space at end a new
> > partition
> > too (it may have been 2 new partitions). WinXP installed okay into one
> >of the partitions (didn't create a
> > filesys on the others).
> >
> > but then it seemed had to change from hda3 to hda6 to boot Debian and
> >then when do gpart/parted it gives a
> > smaller no.
> > of partitions than the XP setup made and has a couple with same
> > starting
> > point (byte? cylinder?)....
> >
> >I then deleted the new partitions (leaving WinXP in the new but smaller
> >partition) but still Debian (eg parted) only sees 3 partitions and two
> >of them start in same place.
> >
> >Sorry for lack of details - will write them down and post later today
> >
> >M
> >
> >
> I'm not sure what is the problem in You're case. Below is my fdisk -l
> output to one of my discs, mayby it'll help You somehow.
> dev boot start end Blocks id system
> /dev/hda1 * 1 1275 10241406 7 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/hda2 1276 23834 181205167+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
> /dev/hda3 23835 24077 1951897+ 83 Linux
> /dev/hda4 24078 24321 1959930 82 Linux swap / Solaris
> /dev/hda5 1276 3825 20482843+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/hda6 3826 5100 10241406 b W95 FAT32
> /dev/hda7 5101 5354 2040223+ 6 FAT16
> /dev/hda8 5355 23834 148440568+ 83 Linux
>
> As You can see hda2 and hda5 start in the same "spot" and hda8 ends with
> the end of hda2. This is qiute normal, as the hda6-8 are the logical
> volumes of hda2 with is the extendet partition. hda 1,3,4 are primary
> partitions.
>
> regards
> Jakub
>
Jakub, it's useful to be told that the logical/extended may have same
start points (obvious once pointed out?). I'm not sure how to determine
this from the fdisk output (or do the trailing '+' on the blocks mean
something?)
I've not found 'fdisk' for Sarge/stable - is it better in anyway than
parted, gpart?
Thanks, Michael
Reply to:
- References:
- partitions
- From: michael <linux@networkingnewsletter.org.uk>
- Re: partitions
- From: Jakub Narojczyk <narojczyk@ifmpan.poznan.pl>