Re: debian unstable, stable enough?
There can be broken dependencies in unstable and testing. At least I've
seen that in the past.
But it's kind of strange to ask if Unstable is stable.
I guess it depends on how much time you want to spend trying to get the
latest and greatest software to work or to just get some work done.
On 9/8/2006, "CaT" <cat@zip.com.au> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:20:35PM +0200, Jordi Carrillo wrote:
>> I'm using Debian testing and I was thinking about switching to unstable. Is
>> Debian unstable, stable enough for a Desktop system? Are there broken
>> dependencies in unstable?
>
>There might not be today but there may be tomorrow. I think there's an
>attempt to keep it usable but, well, it IS unstable...
>
>--
> "To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
> greatest tribute."
> - High Court Judge Michael Kirby
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: