Re: Thread-aware MUAs

[Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com>]

On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:38, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 02:29, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > >> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > >>>> Daniel Rose wrote:
> > >>>> [snip]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware
> > >>>>> email reader, then the problem goes away....
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware?
> > >>>
> > >>> Pine isn't.
> > >>
> > >> after 4.5 it is :-)
> > >
> > > Well, it's still nonfree and thus insignificant.  :o)
> >
> > And how is that relevant to whether
> > (a) it's a *ix MUA, and
> > (b) it's thread-aware?
>
> It doesn't matter.  If it's non-free, it's not worth having.

But Paul, you're non-free.

Hal