On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:35, Mihira Fernando wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > ¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to > > decide it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for president > > is legally nonbinding in nearly all states: the electoral college can and > > does vote for whoever it wants. Out of a quarter billion people, only > > 538 appointed, not elected, people out of the entire country are allowed > > to have a binding vote for US president. So if you don't like the > > current president, you only have 538 people to blame, not the rest of us > > who had no non-violent method to have any say, pro or con, in the matter. > > Good god! so are the Presidential elections that are held in the US a > sham ?? does only 538 really decides who the president is ?? Yes, today they are. The electoral college as practiced in the US made far more sense back in 1776 when it was introduced. The intent of the EC is to make sure someone voting for president for a region 1) can count the local vote (optional) and 2) can read. Given the English literacy rate at 1776 in the US was well under 10%, and the English literacy rate today is 90+%, it's purpose is outdated by at least a century. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca
Attachment:
pgpuHDn3CNu8I.pgp
Description: PGP signature