[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PD: Etch doesn't see an usb camera - errata



Thanks!
I'll try this nigth.

Mirto

Zbigniew Wiech wrote:
>
> "camera" and *"users"* groups
>
> regards
> Zbigniew
> ------ Przesłane przez: Zbigniew Wiech/HeadQ w dniu 2006-07-31 12:43
> -----
> *Zbigniew Wiech/HeadQ*
>
> 2006-07-31 12:42
>
> 	
> Do
> 	debian-user@lists.debian.org
> DW
> 	mbusico@technip.com
> Temat
> 	Odp: Etch doesn't see an usb cameraŁącze
> <Notes:///C12563FC0038BDBF/DABA975B9FB113EB852564B5001283EA/BDCA1199FDD360FAC12571BC0038E249>
>
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
> I had the same problem in "sarge".
> add the user to"camera" group.
>
> regards
> Zbigniew
>
>
> *Mirto Silvio Busico <mbusico@technip.com>*
>
> 2006-07-31 12:04
>
> 	
> Do
> 	debian-user@lists.debian.org
> DW
> 	
> Temat
> 	Etch doesn't see an usb camera
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> anyone experienced this problem?
>
> Using Etch and a Canon s1 is (ptp prtotcol?) I am not able to access the
> photo in the camera.
>
> The camera is correctly detected as an usb device.
> When I connect the camera a popup window (I'm using KDE) asks If I want
> to open the camera as a folder or with digikam.
> Digikam is not able to autodetect the camera. Forcing the model (tried
> normal protocol and ptp) the progam says: "cannot access the mamera":
> Trying to open the camera with Konqueror I see a page with the address
> "media:/camera" containing a folder called "camera"; clicking on the
> folder I see the same page but with the address "media:/camera/camera"
> (a new /camera for every click).
>
> Any hint?
>
> Thanks
> Mirto
>
> --
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Mirto Silvio Busico ICT Consultant
> Tel. +39 333 4562651
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>


-- 

__________________________________________________________
Mirto Silvio Busico 		ICT Consultant
Tel. +39 333 4562651
 



Reply to: