[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cross-referencing files in a GUI



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John O'Hagan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to be able to browse a set of files according to variable 
> criteria without being restricted to particular directories. 
> 
> A simple model to demonstrate: say I have three folders named "work", "rest" 
> and "play", each containing sub-folders called "pictures", "music", 
> and "text".
> 
> What if I want to also view the same files as three folders 
> named "pictures", "music", and "text" each containing three sub-folders 
> named "work", "rest" and "play"?
> 
> Or what if I want to browse my photos in folders according to date ranges, 
> then switch to a view where they are categorised in folders according to 
> whether they are portraits, landscapes, or buildings; or by location, or the 
> name of the subject, etc.? 
> 
> In either case it would be desirable to be able to apply the views over an 
> arbitrary number of directory levels, so that, for example a file does not 
> necessarily appear on the same level (or even the same number of times) in 
> every view.
> 
> One way of conceptualising this could be as a number of co-existing virtual 
> directory trees, each corresponding to a particular view of the same (or 
> overlapping) sets of files. Perhaps using hard links? Or is there a simpler 
> way?
> 
> Apart from the greater flexibility, this would eliminate the need for 
> duplicated subdirectories, i.e., each view would only be as complex as 
> necessary for a particular purpose, replacing one complex tree with several 
> simple ones.
> 
> Is there anything like this available in Debian, or is there a neat way to set 
> it up?

Beagle might be what you want.

Or symlinks.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEvdenS9HxQb37XmcRAk9PAKCP6EoN2Z2juLva7ut26iaBMgxnDgCgvZfr
MVWB96+ldU2e4dIAEEhtD2k=
=zzuG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: