Re: Odd hangs, need recommendations
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bradley Alexander wrote:
> Having a problem tracking down a problem with my wife's machine. Its a
> 1.2GHz Athlon, 768 MB RAM, two HDs a DVD ROM and a CD-RW:
>
> hda: IBM-DTTA-371010, ATA DISK drive
> hdb: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 9100, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> hdc: ST328040A, ATA DISK drive
> hdd: HITACHI GD-2000, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
>
> I rebuilt this pc because the old HD died. MB, CPU and RAM are known
> good, because it came out of my machine when I upgraded. I am running
> unstable with linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 and the nvidia-image-2.6.16-1-k7.
>
> In any case, I am getting what appear to be kernel panics, though they
> are not making it into syslog. I have had two panics that I have
> information on, the first on 17 May:
>
> May 17 23:35:33 sutherland kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> May 17 23:35:33 sutherland kernel: kernel BUG at lib/prio_tree.c:149!
> May 17 23:35:33 sutherland kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> May 17 23:35:33 sutherland kernel: Modules linked in: visor usbserial
> nvidia lp ipv6 reiserfs dm_mod ide_generic mousedev tsdev usblp evdev
> pcspkr bt878 psmouse tuner tvaudio serio_raw msp3400 bttv video_buf
> firmware_class i2c_algo_bit v4l2_common btcx_risc ir_common
[snip]
> Message from syslogd@sutherland at Sat May 20 15:33:35 2006 ...
> sutherland kernel: [pg0+813803171/1338717184] search_by_key+0x124/0xd78
> [reiserfs]
>
> In this panic, it appears to be an issue with reiserfs, however I have
> not seen problems on any other box running reiser.
>
> Could someone suggest what the problem could be based on these traps?
A cable or pin that was loosened when you dug in there, or a DIMM
that got partially unseated or zapped with a bit of static.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEb7DFS9HxQb37XmcRAmt1AKDcmLIV9ZXZVM+/0Tzxlz+cAzA31wCfaziz
FwSngC9pkZ2VMYrCRuRCHDs=
=YNXn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: