Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:32, email@example.com was heard to say:
> OK. It seems that the problem in my understanding might be with
> the word "central planning". Just what do you mean by that phrase?
All airports in the US are government owned. All security is specified
by the FAA and is uniform across all airports. That's how the
murderers were able to take over multiple planes from different
airports: Due to central planning, the same trick worked again and
again. If the tests conducted since are any indication, it would
Also, by FAA regulations, the crews and passengers were all required
to cooperate with the hijackers.
Need I mention that those same crews, and all the passengers, were
deliberately and specifically disarmed by law? Defenseless against a
small handful of thugs armed with box-cutters.
Therefore, the attack on September 11th, 2001, was a rousing success
for central planning and gun control, without which it could not have
The resultant flood of regulation against peaceful citizens was not my
intent with the .sig, but certainly logically follow.
September 11th, 2001
The proudest day for gun control and central
planning advocates in American history
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----