Offensive e-mail received
Hello,
I received this message today, apparently from
ylpvm44-ext.prodigy.net (207.115.57.75)
although it has forged headers.
I suspect that this message violates your TOS
with this person.
Please investigate and handle as appropriate.
If you need more information, you may contact me
at Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net.
Thank you for your time.
-------- Original Message --------
From: - Thu Apr 27 23:02:45 2006
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 00bf8a7305c98aca44350642ee758cae
X-Mozilla-Status: 0003
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Apparently-To: mike.mccarty@sbcglobal.net via 209.191.86.99; Thu, 27
Apr 2006 20:57:54 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [146.82.138.6]
Authentication-Results: mta114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com
from=mytrashmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 207.115.57.75 (EHLO ylpvm44.prodigy.net) (207.115.57.75)
by mta114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:57:54
-0700
X-Originating-IP: [146.82.138.6]
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6]) by
ylpvm44.prodigy.net (8.13.6 inb/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3S3veFL010330 for
<mike.mccarty@sbcglobal.net>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:57:40 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org
(Postfix) with QMQP id CF2112F14C; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:57:37 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <just1207@mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com>
X-Original-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Received: from mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com (unknown [64.40.114.22]) by
murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E462F147 for
<debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:57:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from just1207 by mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com with local (Exim
4.52) id 1FZK6j-0001NY-EP for debian-user@lists.debian.org; Thu, 27 Apr
2006 20:57:29 -0700
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: ATTENTION, IMPORTANT!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: sanchez@mytrashmail.com
X-Originating-IP: [127.0.0.1]
X-Originating-Email: [sanchez@mytrashmail.com]
X-Mailer: Sendmail
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1FZK6j-0001NY-EP@mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com>
Sender: <just1207@mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:57:29 -0700
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it
with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [37398 500] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mmbrs3.bay1.vanc.5gigs.com
X-Source: /usr/bin/php
X-Source-Args: /usr/bin/php Hee-Haw.php
X-Source-Dir: justgetiton.5gigs.com:/public_html
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-11-10_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2006-04-09_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=4.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_95,NO_REAL_NAME, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.0.3
Resent-Message-ID: <6SdjQB.A.niH.xKZUEB@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/436901
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-user@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:57:37 -0500 (CDT)
I don\'t like how when linux messes up during boot badly it sometimes
says \"I\'m hanging here...\" ...can we change it to say \"I\'m jacking
off here\"???
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
END OF ORIGINAL MESSAGE
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
Reply to: