On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 10:55:42PM +0200 or thereabouts, Felix Natter wrote: > Steve A <kru_tch@yahoo.ca> writes: > > > > Is there any particular reason for using '.eps' ? Is it to be printed ? I would > > use gif or png and make the background transparent. > > I am using a standard LaTeX document class for presentations (prosper), > which requires me to use latex+dvips+ps2pdf, and dvips only supports > .eps for images... O OK > Do you have the same problems? I can't imagine why a simple bitmap->bitmap > conversion (without loss, as opposed to jpeg!) would have this kind > of effect. Must be a bug somewhere! No, but then I don't use the same tools. I use Adobe products and if using the .eps as the end format -- The transparency might need to be flattened before saving as .eps. > > You should be able to make > > the eps transparent as well -- I'm not sure of the GIMPs capabilities in that > > format. > > GIMP reports that "eps does not support transparency". You might be able to use PNG, make the background transparent, flatten, then save as .eps. See if that works ... -- Steve A. ----------------------------------------------- Monday May 30 2005 08:25:01 EDT ----------------------------------------------- Complex system: One with real problems and imaginary profits.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature