Re: What's wrong with debian?
Greetings,
Am Dienstag, 1. März 2005 03:37 schrieb Chris Metzler:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:33:50 +0100
>
> Jan Lühr wrote:
> > Am Montag, 28. Februar 2005 23:24 schrieb Robert Brockway:
> >> IMHO the best way to approach the release cycle is to aim to make it
> >> fairly regular (12-18 months would be ideal) with modest aims. The
> >> _only_ significant criticism I hear about Debian is the age of the
> >> stable version. If it was not for this I believe it would have a far
> >> large share of Linux installations to its name. It's got the
> >> stability and the integration people want.
> >
> > and the insecurity people don't want.
>
> Can you clarify what you mean by this statement?
Read my first statement and check the cross-references about the security
shape of stable.
Keep smiling
yanosz
Reply to: