Alvin Oga wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Daniel Webb wrote:On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:16:29AM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote: One nit to pick here:- find | tar | gpg meeets all of my requirements for most all possible potential disasters and recoveryAs I describe on my backup page, that's a terrible idea. One corrupt bit and you lose *huge* amounts of data.if you don't trust find|tar ... you have major problems with the machine's reliability and these brand new commands nobody used for 30 yrs :-)
Hmm? I agree with him. If you don't fear some corruption, then why make backups at all? [snip] Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!