Re: Gnome 2.12

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Gnome 2.12
From: Marcel Stoop <marcels@luon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:15:16 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1134677716.5914.41.camel@localhost>
Reply-to: marcels@luon.net
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200512142207.11198.mcrean@snowpetrel.net>
References: <[🔎] 8b711df40512132255w401b0d40ld878c0278203e7ce@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1134582415.6680.1.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 200512142207.11198.mcrean@snowpetrel.net>

On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 22:07 +0000, Mark Crean wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:46, Marcel Stoop wrote:
> [snip]
> > gnome 2.12 isn't even in sid yet. So it will take at least a few months.
> >
> 
> Is this because it's thought unreliable? I've been using Gnome 2.12 on a 
> couple of other distros without problems so far.

There is a nice blog of one of the gnome-debian maintainers about the
release of Gnome 2.12 and GTK 2.8 in unstable.

http://oskuro.net/blog/freesoftware/gnome-2.12-unstable-2005-12-15-14-19


Cheers,


Marcel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gnome 2.12
  - From: Mark Crean <mcrean@snowpetrel.net>

References:
- Gnome 2.12
  - From: Paras pradhan <pradhanparas@gmail.com>
- Re: Gnome 2.12
  - From: Marcel Stoop <marcels@luon.net>
- Re: Gnome 2.12
  - From: Mark Crean <mcrean@snowpetrel.net>

Prev by Date: How to get Amanda and tape libraries to work?
Next by Date: 2.6 kernel panics with SATA drive
Previous by thread: Re: Gnome 2.12
Next by thread: Re: Gnome 2.12
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread