[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Compile error of GTK



Antony Gelberg wrote:

>Vegard|drageV wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm trying for the first time to make my own gui-program, with menus and
>>all to launch a series of commands and scripts I've written. Google led
>>me to http://www.gtk.org/tutorial/ , where I am to compile the program
>>base.c, given as an example in the text under the link "3. Getting
>>started".
>>
>>Compiling gives this error:
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>vegard@hjem:~/gtk$ gcc base.c -o base `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0`
>>Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
>>Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
>>to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
>>No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
>>base.c:1:21: gtk/gtk.h: Ingen slik fil eller filkatalog
>>base.c: I funktionen 'main':
>>base.c:6: error: `GtkWidget' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>base.c:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>>base.c:6: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>base.c:6: error: `window' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>base.c:10: error: `GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL' undeclared (first use in this
>>function)
>>vegard@hjem:~/gtk$
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>I can not find the files gtk+-2.0.pc ,  gtk/gtk.h anywhere. I tried
>>installing the developmentfiles with:
>>
>>            apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev
>>
>>but this package has dependencies to other packages wich is not
>>available to me, namly:
>>
>>            libpango1.0-dev, libx11-dev, xlibs-dev
>>
>>Is there anybody who have any idea on what I can do to fix the compiler?
>>
>>I have Debian Sarge, kernel 2.4.27-2-686
>>    
>>
>
>In Sarge, every package should be installable.  Is this an old testing
>installation that has not been updated?
>
>
>  
>
TRY IT!! https://www.scientificlinux.org/



Reply to: