RE: Basic routing problem
Brett,
Thanks for the suggestion. Would you be able to share details on how you
configured your systems?
Tx,
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett [mailto:bml@bookcellar.com.au]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:41 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Basic routing problem
>
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Peter Coppens wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>I assume you missed to add a route on R for the net of A pointing
> >>>to B.
> >>
> >>Yes...that is probably what is wrong. Problem is I don't
> have enough
> >>privileges on the router to do that. Seems I am stuck, sigh.
> >
> > You can do NAT for A on B or install a proxy on B.
>
> You can possibly use ARP to get B to listen for A's packets and route
> them accordingly.
>
> For example I have the following setup:
> LAN-1 <--> LAN-2 <--> router <--> internet
>
> All hosts on LAN-1 can talk to all hosts on LAN-2 and all hosts can
> access the internet via the router. I have found this to be a
> very good
> setup. The link between LAN-1 and LAN-2 is very slow and all
> the packets
> get to where they are going without wasting bandwidth. It
> also doesn't
> have any of the disadvantages of NAT'ing.
>
> HTH,
> Brett
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
Reply to: