Re: Basic routing problem
Peter Coppens wrote:
>> I assume you missed to add a route on R for the net of A pointing
>> to B.
>
> Yes...that is probably what is wrong. Problem is I don't have enough
> privileges on the router to do that. Seems I am stuck, sigh.
You could enable NAT on B; in that case, the router doesn't need to know
about A's subnet.
Or maybe you can make B act like a bridge instead of a router and put A
on 192.168.1.0/24.
--
If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood
on the shoulders of giants. -- Isaac Newton
Roel Schroeven
Reply to: