Re: kernel-image or kernel_image?
On 8/10/05, kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all
When compiling kernels using make-kpkg, Is there any difference between
'fakeroot make-kpkg kernel_image' and 'fakeroot make-kpkg kernel-image'?
I read the manual of make-kpkg, but could not find the difference. Some
online documentation is using kernel-image while some other websites are
using kernel_image? What is the difference between the two? Which is
more safer?
Thanks
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Graduate Student, MAE
Cornell University
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
I think it should be kernel_image as stated in the "target" section in make-kpkg's man page.
--
Dell Inspiron 600m
Pentium-M 1.6G
512MB, 60G
ATI 9000 Mobility
Reply to: