Re: 2.6.11 and udev
On Friday 15 July 2005 10:19 am, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:26:44 -0400, H. S. wrote:
> > How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that
> > 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine
> > running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev with no dependency indication
> > that 2.6.12 is required.
> The udev maintainer has been asked this several times. His view is that
> people running "unstable" should expect some instability.
Well, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy then, isn't it? If he thinks it should
be unstable, he doesn't do anything to change it, and it *becomes* unstable.