Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration
On Monday 27 June 2005 09:33, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100,
>
> Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote:
> >> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the
> >> original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping
> >> than with jk and thus is fell out of favour..
> >
> > Yes I know - thats why I was puzzled that even unstable does not have an
> > libapache2-mod-jk
>
> I'm sorry I'm not able to work for Debian ATM:
> http://www.edev.be/blog/index.php/archives/2005/06/27/moving-d-6/
No need to be sorry. I am just grateful for all the work everyone has already
done. I was just puzzled as to the choices - but now I understand its a time
to do things issue rather than a choice thing.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
Reply to: