Sarge: mondo problems
I have just upgraded from woody to sarge. I was previously able to get
mondo to work by hand-installing mondo/mindi from
http://www.sorcerer.mirrors.pair.com/sources/ (the woody version caused
problems).
I have just upgraded from woody to sarge and have removed my custom
mondo/mindi installations and have installed the sarge versions. When I try
to run it with kernel version 2.4.27-2-686 (from the .deb) it bombs, saying
that "ext2 is not compiled in your kernel" (it *is* present as a module) and
I am instructed to compile it into my kernel, or that I can upgrade to a 2.6
kernel. When I install kernel 2.6.8-2-686 (from the .deb again), it gets as
far as "I am backing up your live filesystem now." then after backing up 65%
of my filesystem, I get a "Segmentation fault". The end of my
/var/log/mondo-archive.log looks like this (id no error is reported):
[Main]
libmondo-archive.c->create_afio_files_in_background#1139:
[11548:0] - archived 66 OK
[Main]
libmondo-archive.c->create_afio_files_in_background#1112:
[11548:0] - EXATing 68...
[Main] libmondo-files.c->find_home_of_exe#423:
find_home_of_exe () --- Found getfattr at /usr/bin/getfattr
[Main] libmondo-files.c->find_home_of_exe#425:
find_home_of_exe() --- Could not find getfacl
[Main]
libmondo-archive.c->create_afio_files_in_background#1118:
[11548:1] - archiving 67...
[Main] libmondo-archive.c->make_afioballs_and_images#1598: Storing
set 66
[Main]
libmondo-archive.c->create_afio_files_in_background#1139:
[11548:1] - archived 67 OK
[Main]
libmondo-archive.c->create_afio_files_in_background#1112:
[11548:1] - EXATing 69...
[Main] libmondo-files.c->find_home_of_exe#423:
find_home_of_exe () --- Found getfattr at /usr/bin/getfattr
[Main] libmondo-archive.c->make_afioballs_and_images#1598: Storing
set 67
Unfortunately mondo is a tricky beast to get to work. In the past I've had
to try multiple versions from the above source, until something works. I'd
like to be able to upgrade my work server to sarge, but I'll need to sort
these issues out first.
Any suggestions?
Reply to: