Re: Scanning Front End

To: Aurélien Campéas <aurelien.campeas@uni.lu>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Scanning Front End
From: Robert Wolfe <robert@bufonline.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:09:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0506131209340.15189@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1118678374.6277.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0506130229100.3350@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 1118678374.6277.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Aurélien Campéas wrote:

Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 02:29 -0400, Robert Wolfe a écrit :

Hey all!  Was wondering what a DECENT fron end for KDE or GNOME and sane
would be?


How is sane (xsane actually) not decent ?


I should have said ANY FRONT END.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scanning Front End
  - From: Aurélien Campéas <aurelien.campeas@uni.lu>

References:
- Scanning Front End
  - From: Robert Wolfe <robert@bufonline.dyndns.org>
- Re: Scanning Front End
  - From: Aurélien Campéas <aurelien.campeas@uni.lu>

Prev by Date: Re: Disk Mirroring in Sarge howto
Next by Date: Re: spamassassin bayesian - db format
Previous by thread: Re: Scanning Front End
Next by thread: Re: Scanning Front End
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread