Re: Will Sid go nuts?
On 6/2/05, Lee Braiden <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 Jun 2005 01:34, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > I _had_ planned on just staying with 'testing' in my sources.list. Is
> > that a bad idea?
> I think Patrick might be referring to switching from sid to testing for a
> while, until things settle again. Is that right, Patrick?
No - the original poster suggested that both testing and unstable were
problematic after the last stable release. So I was concerned that
the new 'testing' would be flaky for a while. I've found the current
testing, which I've had in my sources.list for a couple of years now,
mostly reliable, with the occasional glitch. I can continue to live
with that. In other words, cutting edge is OK, but bleeding edge is a
bit too much for me!
Thanks for everyone's advice. I think I'll stick with testing for now.