[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is 64MB enough?



On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:06:32AM -0400, J. Van Lierde wrote:
> John Moore wrote:
> 
> >I'm a total Linux newbie who'd like to install Linux on my really old 
> >PC. It has 64MB of RAM and a 4GB hard disk. The installation 
> >documentation I've read at debian.org seems to indicate that this is 
> >sufficient. Is that right? Thanks.
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
> >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
> I've run sarge with icewm on a 200Mhz Pentium with 64MB and found it 
> barely usable, the disk was paging constantly. If you want to use your 
> mouse, I think you have to pick your window manager (a lot of posters 
> seem to like flux box) and apps for their size (i.e. forget about 
> firefox, openoffice etc.) You want to spend some time mining the 
> debian-user archive, this query comes up regularly.
> 
> On the other hand, it runs real sweet with regular terminal sessions. 
> For that reason, I rationized not throwing it out. It might be useful as 
> a small server someday.

I'm using a 48MB 100MHz Pentium as a file server, and its performance is
adequate.  I also use X on it, with icewm, but avoid *any* graphical
user-interfacing or web-wandering on it, because the graphics is
definitely too slow.

-- hendrik



Reply to: